Cyber security news for all


    The Japanese government wants to simplify identification of perpetrators

    A panel from the Japanese government Ministry of Communications agreed last Thursday that cyberbullying victims should have certain rights when it comes to internet related companies that disclose personal information about digital bullying.

    Shortly before her death, the Japanese wrestler Kimura wrote on Twitter that she received almost a hundred comments a day and that she felt hurt. Her tragic fate suddenly brought cyberbullying to the center of public debate. Japanese government wants to discuss how to change the law to make it easier to identify people who post hateful comments on social media, said Minister Takaichi.

    Japanese government

    Operators Of Digital Platforms Have A Responsibility To Prevent Cyberbullying

    Experts also believe that operators of digital platforms have a responsibility to prevent cyberbullying. According to the current legal situation, internet service providers in Japan can delete anonymous online messages that violate human rights. Cyberbullying victims can also ask operators to disclose information about the originators of hate speech in order to take legal action against them. In many cases, people who practice cyberbullying are not found. Critics warn of a violation of the right to freedom of expression.

    The panel agreed that victims should have the opportunity for website operators, social media operators and internet service providers to disclose defamatory comments in the event of cyberbullying. The panel also said that more dialogue on the issue is needed to overcome the relaxation of the procedural measures required for internet-related businesses to share users personal information so that people who post anonymously defamatory comments online can be identified.

    So far, the current cyberbullying law does not leave much room for maneuver. Internet services are allowed to delete posts if they violate human rights. However, direct anonymous messages cannot be prevented. Victims have the option of requesting the disclosure of information from perpetrators. However, this often does little good. In many cases, the identity of the user cannot be determined since providers do not recognize a clear violation of human rights, which makes further prosecution impossible. It has therefore long been considered changing the legal situation.

    Recent Articles

    Personnel were asked to removed 89 apps which includes Instagram, Facebook, and others by the Indian Army

    Personnel are told by the Indian Army to delete 89 apps from their phones from July 15. This is in a bid to avoid...

    The warning sent to employees about Tiktok app was a mistake says Amazon

    On Friday morning, Amazon sent out a memo to its employees, asking them to uninstall the popular social media app TikTok off their phone....

    Other Android phones sold in the US contains pre-installed malware

    There’s a discovery of Pre-installed malware on another phone by researchers from Malwarebytes; through the lifeline Assistance program for sale in the United States....

    About 15 billion stolen passwords and usernames sold on the dark web.

    A recent finding has shown that about 15 billion passwords and usernames are distributed on the dark web. This compromise will bring about credential...

    Hundreds of multinational companies aimed by Russian BEC Gang

    According to the security firm Agari, there has been a discovery of a newly uncovered Russia-based business email compromise gang; BEC gang that scams...

    Related Stories

    Leave A Reply

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Stay on op - Ge the daily news in your inbox